|
|
Post by DGN on Jan 15, 2011 10:43:39 GMT -5
Talk about our second favorite ape (first is Diddy) here.
Rumors have come that he may have his coconut gun and his dash attack is his movement attack from DK64.
|
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on Jan 15, 2011 10:44:28 GMT -5
I can't wait!
We need big characters (like Petey). We have no big characters at all right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by member 777 on Jan 15, 2011 20:05:38 GMT -5
yeah i cant wait
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Jan 15, 2011 21:21:08 GMT -5
I can't wait! We need big characters (like Petey). We have no big characters at all right now. Enough about Petey. It's annoying and can be considered spam. With this title, it makes me think the Coconut Gun is part of his moveset now... |
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on Jan 15, 2011 21:41:43 GMT -5
I think that they're gonna do that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dettadeus on Jan 15, 2011 21:44:31 GMT -5
Talk about our second favorite ape (first is Diddy) here. You mean he's... SECOND BANANA? Anyways, can't wait for him to make it in, since he's the easiest to hit with Jiggs' Rest. |
|
|
|
Post by StayPuft on Jan 16, 2011 16:57:19 GMT -5
Diddy Kong is a cheap way to advertise Nintendo (just look at his hat).
All I can say is that I hope Crusade follows in SSF2's footsteps and decides to not use King of Swing's sprites.
|
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on Jan 16, 2011 19:43:42 GMT -5
I liked the sprites we saw on the old forums. What were they from?
|
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on Jan 17, 2011 4:30:30 GMT -5
I posted them from DK King of Swing for the Nintendo DS.
I know what sheet is used but i don't will spoil.
|
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on Jan 17, 2011 9:01:23 GMT -5
I don't really care what sprites we use.
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Jan 17, 2011 9:54:05 GMT -5
To me, as long as they match the diddy kong sprites, its fine.
But if they use KoS for GB, it won't match me and Rugos' expansions for King K. Rool and Dixie Kong.
|
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on Jan 17, 2011 10:25:05 GMT -5
What Didy kong Sprites are used?
|
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on Jan 17, 2011 10:45:46 GMT -5
I don't think we know yet.
|
|
