|
|
Post by tjelloboy on May 8, 2011 17:15:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on May 8, 2011 17:31:22 GMT -5
....Just leave.
It's been one crappy suggestion after another.
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on May 8, 2011 17:36:45 GMT -5
...Wat is dis i don;t evn...
The only think Iggly would contribute would be that she's part of the 2nd generation, but really? She brings nothing to the table. Heck, Pichu would be better, being "related" to Pikachu, the main character, and has actually been in the game and could be different.
What Golden says may be a bit harsh but...its pretty much the truth. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on May 8, 2011 18:06:58 GMT -5
The only decent suggestion was King Boo, as he's a recurring enemy to Mario and Luigi.
However, the moveset posted was horrible.
And there's also the fact that King Boo would be heavily limited due to his lack of legs.
As for Rotom, it doesn't have arms OR legs, and is not important enough. Not only that, but the moveset posted doesn't use REAL Pokemon moves, like the other Pokemon characters.
But Igglybuff? Really? A weaker, lighter clone of a weak, light character? There is something seriously wrong if it sounds like a good idea.
Now, WIGGLYTUFF, I could understand. Wigglytuff can be more unique due to it's body shape and viable ears, and can be heavier and stronger than Jigglypuff. But even Wigglytuff is a poor choice for a new character.
|
|
|
|
Post by sumika on May 8, 2011 19:06:05 GMT -5
You two should be ashamed. Really.
You don't tell someone to leave because they make a suggestion you don't like. That's absolutely rude and very ignorant. I really wouldnt expect that from you two. =l
As for the idea, the biggest problem with it is that it's very cloney. And no one likes clones.
We have plenty of pokemon reps. So dont worry. :3
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on May 8, 2011 19:09:40 GMT -5
Hm? I was't saying that he had to leave.
I was agreeing that its been one bad suggestion after another.
tjelloboy, can you explain why you would even like this character in the game? Say some things that might possibly convince us to have him in the game?
|
|
|
|
Post by tjelloboy on May 8, 2011 19:17:17 GMT -5
I do not know but Igglybuff might have some specials that can fight so what do you think igglybuff can have?
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on May 8, 2011 19:38:10 GMT -5
You two should be ashamed. Really. You don't tell someone to leave because they make a suggestion you don't like. That's absolutely rude and very ignorant. I really wouldnt expect that from you two. =l As for the idea, the biggest problem with it is that it's very cloney. And no one likes clones. We have plenty of pokemon reps. So dont worry. :3 This is the THIRD suggestion that he made which isn't very good. First was King Boo, which I said was decent. Then was Rotom, which is a poor choice. Now Igglybuff, a piss poor choice. And it wasn't ignorant; I KNEW what I was saying when I said it.  I do admit though, that was rude....that's why I said it like that. ;D tjelloboy: There is NOTHING that Igglybuff has that Jigglypuff doesn't. Not only would it be a clone, but a really BAD clone, considering it would be very easy to kill because it'd be the lightest character, and would be really weak. Like I said, Wigglytuff is better. Wigglytuff would be heavier, stronger, possibly lack the ability to fly and roll due to it's body shape, and can use it's ears to fight as well as actual punches and kicks because it's appendenges aren't stubby. Mega Punch? Sure. Hi-Jump Kick? Why not. |
|
|
|
Post by sumika on May 8, 2011 19:42:16 GMT -5
You two should be ashamed. Really. You don't tell someone to leave because they make a suggestion you don't like. That's absolutely rude and very ignorant. I really wouldnt expect that from you two. =l As for the idea, the biggest problem with it is that it's very cloney. And no one likes clones. We have plenty of pokemon reps. So dont worry. :3 This is the THIRD suggestion that he made which isn't very good. First was King Boo, which I said was decent. Then was Rotom, which is a poor choice. Now Igglybuff, a piss poor choice. And it wasn't ignorant; I KNEW what I was saying when I said it. tjelloboy: There is NOTHING that Igglybuff has that Jigglypuff doesn't. Not only would it be a clone, but a really BAD clone, considering it would be very easy to kill because it'd be the lightest character, and would be really weak. Like I said, Wigglytuff is better. Wigglytuff would be heavier, stronger, possibly lack the ability to fly and roll due to it's body shape, and can use it's ears to fight as well as actual punches and kicks because it's appendenges aren't stubby. Mega Punch? Sure. Hi-Jump Kick? Why not. FF- My point is, It was close to flaming, that's all. :u Or you know. A completely different pokemon that's not balloon based. =x |
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on May 8, 2011 19:45:48 GMT -5
Like....Meowth.
Meowth is what we all want. Or at least over Rival Trainer. Most people want Deoxys in, but will take Meowth over RT.
|
|
|
|
Post by sumika on May 8, 2011 19:49:10 GMT -5
Like....Meowth. Meowth is what we all want. Or at least over Rival Trainer. Most people want Deoxys in, but will take Meowth over RT. Why not make Rival Trainer, Rocket Trainer? |
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on May 8, 2011 19:55:50 GMT -5
No. New. Trainer.
Meowth is more deserving on his own that as part of a Trainer.
It'd be like cutting Pikachu out and instead, adding Ash and have Pikachu as one of his Pokemon.
|
|
|
|
Post by sumika on May 8, 2011 19:59:43 GMT -5
^ I'd prefer Red. Ash is meh because of the anime, RED is at least in the games. Uh. And I wouldnt mind it at all actually. But rethinking the rocket idea, they kind of have really dull pokemon. And I would only like meowth if he COULDNT talk. So blarhghskdjs. Anywho. Were getting off topic I believe. Blah, I'm sorry but I'll have to agree with everyone else. It's just... No. Its like saying we should take out Pichu, and replace him with Igglybuff. Its still the same thing as Adding Pichu, which I'm sure we're not. And as a random question, I wonder why mewtwo was the only playable legendary..  EDIT: on second thought, don't answer my random question. It'll start more off topic discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by StayPuft on May 8, 2011 20:01:06 GMT -5
No Igglybuff. kthnx. And DMX said that the roster is nearing completion (for the 1000th time), so yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by El Maiz on May 8, 2011 20:35:25 GMT -5
Ahm....
Just no.
|
|
|
|
Post by plasmis on May 8, 2011 20:56:55 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure everyone has said what I intended to say for some time already. I'm always the type of guy who gives a fair judgment on people, but this idea certainly needs some recapping to do. I mean suggesting ideas isn't bad, but you have to understand what type of suggestions you should suggest. You should suggest characters that may benefit us and at the same time, add a type of uniqueness into your suggestions. Now I think you should go back and do some more research and suggest better suggestions than just pulling out random ideas. Remember, we don't want to have clones. That is my-, no our advice to you. So far, we have been grateful of your activeness on the forum and we appreciate it, so just try harder next time!
|
|
ensane
Forum Regular
Posts: 379
|
Post by ensane on May 8, 2011 21:38:52 GMT -5
Not very viable in my opinion. Jumping would star KO the poor thing XD
|
|
|
|
Post by falcon8r on May 8, 2011 22:45:41 GMT -5
Oh, the shield break for Iggly would be hilarious! ;D
But I honestly don't see any other reason to add in this character. We need more diversity in our Pokemon.
|
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on May 9, 2011 1:45:04 GMT -5
He would be a clone of Jiggs?
|
|
|
|
Post by falcon8r on May 9, 2011 15:57:28 GMT -5
Well, it doesn't have to be a clone, but Igglybuff is just too similar of a Pokemon in general .
|
|
I do admit though, that was rude....that's why I said it like that. ;D
