Well, the forum's gotten a bit dramatic, eh?

[-Dr.MarioX-]

I did grade Agumon and did everything Phantom did. I also did the same for Ancient Minister and Ratchet. They were all in PM's, so I don't know who got them.

[El Maiz]

You said:

Representation: It started out as a decent series, but it's been falling to scores in the 70's. The original got only 3 scores that were above a 90. Another thing is that Ratchet has never appeared on a Nintendo console and most people found the two characters very boring.
3.5

Popularity: He has a manga, action figures. You know, he's popular.
4

Moveset Potential: Apparently, you've came up with a moveset...
4.5

Uniqueness: So he's a young animal with a gun...Star Fox? Honestly, he would play just like Fox, who plays just like Falco, who plays a lot like Wolf.
3.5

Total: 15.5 FINAL SCORE: 77
We really don't accept characters under 80...

To which I replied:

The only two games that got below seventies were NOT made by the same company as the rest. And I'm not sure where you're getting this "most of the reviews for the first game were under 90". When I checked, there were SIX that were nintey or above, one of which was a 10/10.


Quote:
"Quite simply the best platform game on the PS2 right now and possibly the best on any format!"


As for the second game, which they improved much on the first, got eight scores above nintey, as well as winning 11th on IGN's "top 25 Playstation games of all time"

The third game received PERFECT scores from THREE reviewers, including the very picky GameInformer. IN the past year, the only other game I've seen them give a perfect score was Starcraft 2.



If you looked at the moveset, he plays as similarly to Fox as Snake plays to Ganondorf (read: not at all).

Make of this what you will.

Which I notice that you not only didn't research, you ignored my reply and also completely ignored the moveset I SENT IN THE PM.


You also seemed to take every chance you got to give him a low score. What happened to "Unbiased"?

[GoldenYuiitusin]

And I never got CRAP from you about Agumon. You sir, are a perpetual liar.

[jaklub]

@up: u mad

drmariox said:

so I don't know who got them.

[phantomhp]

Hey guys, not helping with the whole "Try and argue nicely" bit.

[-Dr.MarioX-]

May 18, 2011 7:38:52 GMT -5 El Maiz said:

You said:

Representation: It started out as a decent series, but it's been falling to scores in the 70's. The original got only 3 scores that were above a 90. Another thing is that Ratchet has never appeared on a Nintendo console and most people found the two characters very boring.
3.5

Popularity: He has a manga, action figures. You know, he's popular.
4

Moveset Potential: Apparently, you've came up with a moveset...
4.5

Uniqueness: So he's a young animal with a gun...Star Fox? Honestly, he would play just like Fox, who plays just like Falco, who plays a lot like Wolf.
3.5

Total: 15.5 FINAL SCORE: 77
We really don't accept characters under 80...

To which I replied:

The only two games that got below seventies were NOT made by the same company as the rest. And I'm not sure where you're getting this "most of the reviews for the first game were under 90". When I checked, there were SIX that were nintey or above, one of which was a 10/10.


Quote:
"Quite simply the best platform game on the PS2 right now and possibly the best on any format!"


As for the second game, which they improved much on the first, got eight scores above nintey, as well as winning 11th on IGN's "top 25 Playstation games of all time"

The third game received PERFECT scores from THREE reviewers, including the very picky GameInformer. IN the past year, the only other game I've seen them give a perfect score was Starcraft 2.



If you looked at the moveset, he plays as similarly to Fox as Snake plays to Ganondorf (read: not at all).

Make of this what you will.

Which I notice that you not only didn't research, you ignored my reply and also completely ignored the moveset I SENT IN THE PM.


You also seemed to take every chance you got to give him a low score. What happened to "Unbiased"?

If you re-read my original message, I said he got 3 scores above a 90, not most were under.

And I have graded Agumon. Look around here and you should find it.

Golden, need I remind you again that we should have a polite discussion here. You and El Maiz both. And I'm not lying either and your wording is rather rude.

[sumika]

May 18, 2011 12:05:53 GMT -5 -Dr.MarioX- said:

May 18, 2011 7:38:52 GMT -5 El Maiz said:

You said:


To which I replied:


Which I notice that you not only didn't research, you ignored my reply and also completely ignored the moveset I SENT IN THE PM.


You also seemed to take every chance you got to give him a low score. What happened to "Unbiased"?

If you re-read my original message, I said he got 3 scores above a 90, not most were under.

And I have graded Agumon. Look around here and you should find it.

Golden, need I remind you again that we should have a polite discussion here. You and El Maiz both. And I'm not lying either and your wording is rather rude.

He's right. Especially you Golden. You OFTEN come off as rude, or insulting when you argue. Mind your tongue when you're replying.

Obviously I dont think this even deserves to be open anymore. Its more of a "Lets hate on DMX" thread. Than anything else.
Locked. If another Dev wants to unlock, fine by me.