dry
Forum Regular
sup
Posts: 213
|
Post by dry on Aug 14, 2011 6:51:46 GMT -5
There's no way to turn a Pikachu into a Pichu in any game. So that wouldn't work out.
|
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on Aug 14, 2011 7:13:50 GMT -5
You don't get me. As an ALT. An ALT is a clone,Pichu is a clone of Pikachu in melee,so it could work.
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 7:39:22 GMT -5
There's no way to turn Ryu into Dark Ryu, at least in SSBC.
It could easily work out.
|
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on Aug 14, 2011 8:51:09 GMT -5
Thank you there DGN. Picu would be awesome,and Det made some Sprites,iirc.
|
|
|
|
Post by -Dr.MarioX- on Aug 14, 2011 11:55:13 GMT -5
This will make you all happy- Rival Trainer was axed for Zoroark!
However, Phantom has ideas surrounding Pokemon Trainer- perhaps changing Squirtle and Ivysaur. He refuses to cut Charizard.
|
|
The 85.
Forum Attendee
Link FTW
Posts: 175
|
Post by The 85. on Aug 14, 2011 12:14:11 GMT -5
Replacing Squirtle and Ivysaur? I don't agree with that, since Squirtle has a almost finished sheet.
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 12:21:02 GMT -5
However, Phantom has ideas surrounding Pokemon Trainer- perhaps changing Squirtle and Ivysaur. He refuses to cut Charizard. NONONONONONONONONONONONON PLEEEEEEEEEEEEASE NO I BEG YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU Seriously though. We JUST got through getting all brawl vets in(Ice climbers). Do we really have to go through getting some of Pokemon Trainer's pokes again? |
|
|
|
Post by Dettadeus on Aug 14, 2011 12:25:43 GMT -5
WHAT THE CRAP ARE YOU THINKING.
We finally have all the Brawl vets on the roster and then you go ahead and wreck that? Really? Your plan for Pokemon Trainer had better be something like Mudkip, Bayleef, Charizard. Or Totodile, Grovyle, Charizard. That would at least make the slightest bit of sense since those are all Pokemon that the player could have as starters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Slissith on Aug 14, 2011 12:35:54 GMT -5
This will make you all happy- Rival Trainer was axed for Zoroark! However, Phantom has ideas surrounding Pokemon Trainer- perhaps changing Squirtle and Ivysaur. He refuses to cut Charizard.  |
|
|
|
Post by PartisanDaw on Aug 14, 2011 12:38:31 GMT -5
This will make you all happy- Rival Trainer was axed for Zoroark! However, Phantom has ideas surrounding Pokemon Trainer- perhaps changing Squirtle and Ivysaur. He refuses to cut Charizard.  No,thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by Dettadeus on Aug 14, 2011 12:42:55 GMT -5
And to think I was about to work on some Ivysaur sprites...
Also:
inb4Golden rage.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Aug 14, 2011 12:57:29 GMT -5
Why must everyone assume I'm going to rage?
@dmx As everyone said, we now have all the Brawl vets. Why fix what isn't broken? As I've said before, not every Gen needs a rep. Only the latest one. To shoehorn them into an alredy established character is wrong. PT is Red.
Anyways, I have a unique idea for a character that can shamelessly shoehorn them and actually make sense. And best of all, even by Phantom's standards, it would still count as one charcter. PM me if you are interested, DMX. Note that it is an idea to go WITH PT and Zoroark, not replace one of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 13:05:16 GMT -5
@dmx As everyone said, we now have all the Brawl vets. Why fix what isn't broken? As I've said before, not every Gen needs a rep. Only the latest one. To shoehorn them into an alredy established character is wrong. PT is Red. Third gen hasn't been repped yet. So they aren't repping all of them. |
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Aug 14, 2011 13:12:29 GMT -5
@dmx As everyone said, we now have all the Brawl vets. Why fix what isn't broken? As I've said before, not every Gen needs a rep. Only the latest one. To shoehorn them into an alredy established character is wrong. PT is Red. Third gen hasn't been repped yet. So they aren't repping all of them. If you were reading above, Phantom wants to replace Squirtle and Ivysaur. With what I assume a 2nd Gen and a 3rd Gen. Totodile and Grovyle or Mudkip and Bayleef. I think... |
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 13:14:18 GMT -5
Ah, Ok then. That's more logical.
I hope they do something like that...
If so, IMO it should be Mudkip and Bayleef. Seeing as Mudkip is VERY popular.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Aug 14, 2011 13:20:47 GMT -5
Ah, Ok then. That's more logical. I hope they do something like that... If so, IMO it should be Mudkip and Bayleef. Seeing as Mudkip is VERY popular. I fail to see the logic. It'd be the problem with Rival's original Pokemon all over again. |
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 13:22:53 GMT -5
Well I mean, 2 Kanto pokemon and 1 johto pokemon makes less sense than 1 of the beginning 3, if Squirtle and Ivysaur were to be taken out.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Aug 14, 2011 13:29:35 GMT -5
Why does one even need to be taken out in the first place?
|
|
|
|
Post by DGN on Aug 14, 2011 13:31:49 GMT -5
I agree by that. I'm just saying that what I thought they had changed to made less sense than what you thought they changed to.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoldenYuiitusin on Aug 14, 2011 14:44:23 GMT -5
Ah, I understand now.
|
|
